Where to begin oh lord, forgive the trespasses of those who think they can act.

Dear God forgive those who think they can direct.

This movie is so bad, its sad to watch and I can hear the good lord contemplating the ways he will kill himself over how bad this movie bearing his name and title is.

The acting, what acting? It is so over the top, so lame and so unrealistic, and the script, even worse t hen the acting.

If I were God, I would watch this movie and then smite humanity starting with a thunder bolt to the director and his cast for creating such a bad film that mentions his name in vane.

Unfortunately, this installment fails to deliver anything new or engaging. The narrative feels repetitive, almost like a rehash of the same arguments we've seen in previous movies, with no meaningful evolution or depth.

The characters are one-dimensional, and the dialogue is filled with clichés that feel forced and preachy. It lacks the emotional depth and nuance needed to make the viewer truly feel invested in the story. The plot twists, which could have added some excitement, are predictable and lack any real impact.

Moreover, the film spends too much time trying to make a point rather than telling a compelling story. It feels less like a movie and more like a long sermon with a few dramatic scenes thrown in. For a film that's meant to inspire and provoke thought, it ends up feeling more like a lecture than an exploration of faith.

While I respect the effort to make faith-based films, *God's Not Dead: In God We Trust (2024)* fails to provide the creativity, originality, or depth that makes a movie memorable. If you're looking for an engaging story or thought-provoking discussions on faith, this movie will likely leave you disappointed.

In this misguided film, the narrative attempts to fuse religion with politics, presenting faith as a necessary moral compass for governance. While the cinematography is commendable, the underlying premise is problematic. The script relies heavily on emotional manipulation, glossing over the complexities of secular governance. It oversimplifies the debate, painting skeptics as antagonists to virtue, when in reality, many advocate for ethics grounded in reason and humanity. By failing to engage with the realities of a pluralistic society, the film risks alienating viewers who value rational discourse. Ultimately, it leaves one questioning its intentions rather than fostering meaningful dialogue.