while there was no reason to make this movie,at least it is better than the 2nd one.the acting is better,the twists are more believable and the characters,while not overly developed,have at least some dimension to them.the movie is much better paced than its predecessor,and will hold your interest for the most part.though you may wonder,as i did,why we needed two sequels to a movie that tells the same basic story only much more effectively.there is not a lot more to say about this one.it certainly falls short of the original.it is still a less than average effort for this genre(just not as bad as the 2nd installment)and offers nothing new.but if you have nothing better to do with your time,you could do worse than watch this movie.keep your expectations low and you may not be too disappointed. 4* out of 10
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
2005
Action / Crime / Drama / Mystery / Thriller
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
2005
Action / Crime / Drama / Mystery / Thriller
Plot summary
Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.
Uploaded by: FREEMAN
March 01, 2021 at 01:49 AM
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.WEB 1080p.WEBMovie Reviews
better than the 2nd effort,but not great
Wow! this was really stupid!
The original Wild things is a classic.
They're not going to ruin that with these non-inventive low budget straight-to-video sequels, it's more embarrassing for the ones involved with it.
All the attempts to make it like the first one fall short.
The movie has the same twist and turns as the first movie and it's sequel, which is now formulated and makes nothing that happen a surprise.
Normally, I would give a point for nudity, but naked boobs is not even enough to make this film appealing.
just really crap.
Oh my oh my
Some Sundays you just want to stay indoors, sheltered from the poor weather, watching movies and eating popcorn. And mostly you do not really care about the quality of the film you are watching. Unfortunately, having too little to choose from, this does not always end up being the case: I had a bad feeling about this one, and did only see the movie because a friend of mine gave it to me for free (and I wonder why...). This boring and VERY predictable flick contained tons of cartoonish stereotypes, pisspoor acting, lousy editing and a script worse than in most cartoons for kids. Even the wannabe sexy seminude girl-on-girl scenes are so put on that they get you less hot than outdoor swimming during a snowy winter. Be warned, spend your two hours doing something better!